Motorists hit 180km/h near Newcastle to conjure ghost of dead motorcyclist

It is quite an insane story for these days but there are still exist some superstitious motorists who believe that if they speeding up to 180km/h in Lemon Tree Passage road, they can have the chance to see a ghostly bright light believed to be the spirit of a 20-year old motorcyclist killed in a crash with a speeding driver around the area about 3 years ago. Surprisingly, they used that as an excuse to speed up. They even interested to get the footage of it for YouTube. The video posted so far only show a clearly visible bright light which sometimes near or far away from the car that driving at dangerous speed. But the source of the light is unclear. To clear up things, the police commented on the situation that the only light that they could possibly see when they speed up is the red and blue lights of a police car!

Girl vanishes: Where is she?

Western Sydney: Kiesha Abrahams, a six year-old girl, had disappeared from home after her bed time. She was last seen wearing a pink pyjamas and a purple jacket.Her parents just realised her missing at 10am the next morning. Her mother had make a report, where after that an extensive search is carried out within areas close to Kiesha's house. The police have been told that there was no sign of force entry. The front door of their house was unlocked meaning Kiesha may have wandering off on her own. The families are in a deep grief and her parents are distraught. The family's friend, Kylie Wakeling, never thought that this would happen to Kiesha since she is a quiet girl and always stick to her self rather than a wanderer. The search is still in progress.

For further references: http://www.news.com.au/national/fears-for-missing-keisha-abrahams/story-e6frfkvr-1225899780956

Victorian father Robert Farquharson found guilty of murder of three sons

Farquharson, 41, has been sentenced to three life terms for murdering his three sons by driving them into a dam on Father's Day. That was the second time he was found guilty as his first trial has been quashed by the Court of Appeal. His supporters, including his sisters, wept.



Farquharson pleaded not gulity by saying that he had coughing fit, blacked out and woke up in the dam where his sons die. His lawyer also claims that the fact where he invited a friend to join their trip to Geelong can be the evidence that he had no intention to kill the boys. Farquharson is said to be a shy and uneducated man who loves his own sons.



For further references: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/father-guilty-of-murder-of-three-sons/story-e6frg6nf-1225895749405

Brothel owner employed schoolgirl

Andrew Hewinson, the owner of Brunswick brothel Pickwood Lodge, and his former manager, Janette Woods are charged in court for allowing 14-years old girl to work as a prostitute in their brothel in last 3 years. Woods was found guilty of allowing the child to work with him ignoring the facts that she was not in the legal age. He has been placed on the sex offenders register for life and given 125 hours of unpaid community service. While, Mr Hewinson was facing the same charges but the case on him did not proceed. He claims that he never met that girl and being understood that she was 24 years old. Now, he intends to buy Kryal Castle and turn it into casino and brothel replacing the Pickwood Lodge which he has sold.

For further references: http://www.watoday.com.au/breaking-news-national/brothel-owner-employed-schoolgirl-20100721-10l1b.html

Program to stop teens courting trouble

A tournament called Midnight Basketball is a free program for children from 12 to 18 years old. It is going to be held for eight weeks beginning next week. This programme includes dinner, life-skills workshop, tournament match plus transportation to home. It is organized by Salisbury Council and Elizabeth Blue Light. Their main aim is to keep those at-risk teenagers away from the streets starts at 7.30pm untill midnight. This programme had once held in Geraldton, Western Australia and Kempsey, New South Wales which results in positive feedback from the police officers in both places regarding the decreases in any violence accidents during the tournament period. This programme is still open for new registration as participants or volunteers.


For further references: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/program-to-stop-teens-courting-trouble/story-e6frea83-1225892944428

UNSW students in dark as union bans bite amid pay dispute

About 70 academic staffs in University of New South Wales are having strikes on submitting students' assignment and exams mark. This is regarding the disagreement over their fixed contracts and wages. With the support from NTEU(National Tertiary Education Union), they seek for changes of conditions in their contracts to match up with the modern award. However, the university claims that they need full flexibility to adjust employment arrangements. As a result, the university management decides to dock pay from those involved. NTEU responses by saying that they will continue the bans. Their action may give big impact to the students when they get back from their holiday such as classes disruption.



+++From my point of view, this is really unbeneficial. There are still many other ways to seek for better fulfill of workers' welfare. Plus, in this situation, the students are affected too. Both side should be more aware on these negative externalities from their actions.+++


For further reference: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/unsw-students-in-dark-as-union-bans-bite-amid-pay-dispute/story-e6frgcjx-1225891486317

Arguementative Essay Final Draft - TV

All levels of people, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidenced by American Time Use Survey (2003), most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologists and parents on extensive television viewing as it may affects children's thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claim that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. I totally agree with that as I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient way of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news programmes. This has been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programmes help young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used as an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It is also agreed by Rutherford (2002), whereby he states that television viewing enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impacts to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefit the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skills of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #2 - TV

All level of generation, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidenced by American Time Use Survey (2003), a survey on average hours per day spent in leisure and sports activities for the total population by selected characteristics showed that most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologists and parents on extensive television viewing of unsuitable programme towards children as it may affects their thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claims that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. I totally agree with that as I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient ways of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news programmes. This had been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programmes help young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used as an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It is also agreed by Rutherford (2002), whereby he states that television viewing enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impacts to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefits the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skill of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. Hence, it is a desirable outcome for the survey conducted by UK Time Use Survey (2000), which they found out that full-time workers in United Kingdom had spent most of their times on television, video and radio rather than socialising, sports and exercise, attending entertainment and cultural events, and other activities. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #1 - TV

All level of generation, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidence by American Time Use Survey (2003), a survey on average hours per day spent in leisure and sports activities for the total population by selected characteristics showed that most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologist and parents on extensive television viewing of unsuitable programme towards children as it may affects their thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claims that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. As for me, I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient ways of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be used as a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news program. This had been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programs helps young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It also agreed by Rutherford, 2002, whereby he states that through television viewing, it enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impact to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefits the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such a skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skill of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. Hence, it is a desirable outcome for the survey conducted by UK Time Use Survey (2000), which they found out that full-time workers in United Kingdom had spent most of their times on television, video and radio rather than socialising, sports and exercise, attending entertainment and cultural events, and other activities. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

Final Draft of Junk Food Essay

Should the sale of junk food in school be banned?

Food that is said to be insalubrious and with low nourishment content is categorized as junk food (Smith 2005). Based on statistics made by Australian Nutrition Journal (2004), most Australian children take foods rich in fat and sugar more than recommended intake which most of the foods are junk food. This has become an issue in Australia as it is being alleged as major factors of childhood obesity (Weekend News 2005). Consequently, an idea of restricting the selling of junk foods in school canteens is propound. I strongly agree with that as I firmly believe that the habit of eating junk food can leads to behavioural problem, exacerbate a person's health and cause increment in litter conundrum.

First factor that leads me to support my notion is that the habit of eating junk food can cause attitude problems among the children. This is further explained by Smith (2009), whereby he states that most chemical additives within junk food could cause children to be hyperactive and a lapse in concentration. Besides that, according to Green (2005), as a teacher he can see that removing junk food from his school canteen results in amelioration of student's behaviour in class. They became much calmer after their lunch. Thus, selling of junk food in school canteen should be banned for the sake of student's benefits.

Second factor is the habit of binge on junk food also detrimental to health. Selling of junk food in school canteen actually leads to the problem of childhood obesity which can result in future effects such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and some cancers (Weekend News 2005). Studies had been done and they conclude that the most popular snack foods are under the categories of low nutritional value (Health Foundation 2005). If the selling is to be continued, students cannot get the nutrients required for healthy growth and development (Cray 2005). "...decline in the dental health of Australia's primary-school children" (Weekend News 2005, p.6) is also one of the concern regarding the negative effects of eating junk foods. In short, to improve on the students' learning potential, the school canteen should be prohibited from selling unwholesome foods and drinks.

Lastly, the habit of eating junk foods is not beneficial to the students and also it affects the school in the sense of litter problem. This is further justify by Smith (2005), whereby he states that snack food packaging is found out to be major contributor to litter problem in school. This will leads to hike in cleaning cost for the school plus eroding the good image of the communities. Removing the selling of junk foods in other ways can benefits the school as the workers will spend less time cleaning the grounds and more time for other productive purposes (Green 2005). Hence, it is cogent argument for the school to disallow the selling of junk foods in school canteen.

All in all, selling of junk foods in school canteen should be banned for these three indisputable facts, it will caused behavioural problem and aggravates the children's health and also brings litter problem to the school. As students spend most of their time in school instead of home, the school's authority should play their role in educating the students towards a healthy lifestyle. Hence, I strongly stand on my notion that selling of junk food in school canteen should be prohibited.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #2

Should the sale of junk food in school be banned?

Food that is said to be insalubrious and with low alimentation content are categorizes as junk food (Smith 2005, p.3). Based on statistics made by Australian Nutrition Journal (2004), most Australian children take foods rich in fat and sugar more than recommended intake which most of the foods are junk food. This has become an issue in Australia as it is being alleged as major factors of childhood obesity (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Consequently, an idea of restricting the selling of junk foods in school canteens is propound. I strongly agree with that as I firmly believe that the habit of eating junk food can leads to behavioural problem, exacerbate a person's health and cause increment in litter conundrum.

First factor that leads me to support my notion is that the habit of eating junk food can caused attitude problems among the children. This is further explained by Smith (2009), whereby he states that most chemical additives within junk food could cause children to be hyperactive and a lapse in concentration. Besides that, according to Green (2005), as a teacher he can see that removing junk food from his school canteen results in amelioration of student's behaviour in class. They became much calmer after their lunch. Thus, selling of junk food in school canteen should be banned for the sake of student's benefits.

Second factor is the habit of binge on junk food also detrimental to health. Selling of junk food in school canteen actually leads tot he problem of childhood obesity which can result in future efects such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and some cancers (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Studies had been done and they conclude that the most popular snack foods are under the categories of low nutritional value (Health Foundation 2005). If the selling is to be continued, students cannot get the nutrients required for healthy growth and development (Cray 2005). "...decline in the dental health of Australia's primary-school children' (Weekend News 2005, p.6) is also one of the concern regarding the negative effects of eating junk foods. In short, to improve on the students' learning potential, the school canteen should be prohibited from selling unwholesome foods and drinks.


Lastly, the habit of eating junk foods is not beneficial to the students and also it affects the school in the sense of litter problem. This is further justified by Smith (2005), whereby he stated that snack food packaging is found out to be major contributor to litter problem in school. This will leads to hike in cleaning cost for the school plus eroding the good image of the communities. Removing the selling of junk foods in other ways can benefits the school as the workers will spend less time cleaning the grounds and more time for other productive purposes (Green 2005). Hence, it is cogent argument for the school to disallow the selling of junk foods in school canteen.


All in all, selling of junk foods in school canteen should be banned for these three indisputable facts, it will caused behavioural problem and aggravates the children's health and also brings litter problem to the school. As students spend most of their time in school instead of home, the school's authority should plat their role in educating the students towards a healthy lifestyle. Hence, I strongly stand on my notion that selling of junk food in school canteen should be prohibited.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #1

Should the sale of junk food in school canteens be banned?

Unhealthy food and food with low nutritional value are categorized as junk food (Smith 2005, p.3). Based on statistics made by Australian Nutrition Journal (2004), most Australian children take foods rich in fat and sugar more than recommended intake which most of the foods are junk food. This has become an issue in Australia as it is being alleged as major factors of childhood obesity (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Consequently, there is suggestion that sales of junk foods in school canteens should be prohibited. I strongly agree with that as I firmly believe that the habit of eating junk food can leads to behavioural problem, health problem and litter problem.

First factor that leads me to support this argument is it caused attitude problems among the children. This has been further explained by Smith (2009), whereby he stated that most chemical additives within junk food could cause children to be hyperactive and involved in lack of focus problem. Besides that, according to Green (2005), as a teacher he can see that removing junk food from his school canteen results in improvement in student’s behaviour in class. They became much calmer after their lunch. Thus, selling of junk food in school canteen should be banned for the sake of the students’ benefits.

Second factor is eating junk food also contribute to health problem. Selling of junk foods in school canteen actually leads to the problem of childhood obesity which can results in future effects such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and some cancers (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Studies had been done and they conclude that most popular snack foods are under the categories of low nutritional value (Health Foundation 2005). If the selling is to be continued, students cannot get the nutrients required for healthy growth and development (Cray 2005). ‘..decline in the dental health of Australia’s primary-school children’ (Weekend News 2005, p.6) is also one of the concern regarding the negative effects of eating junk foods. In short, to ameliorate the students learning potential, the school canteen should be prohibited from selling unhealthy foods and drinks.

Lastly, the habit of eating junk foods is not beneficial to the students and also it affects the school in the sense of litter problem. This has been further justified by Smith (2005), whereby he stated that snack food packaging is found out to be the major contributor to litter problem in school. This will leads to rise in cleaning cost for the school plus eroding the good image of the communities. Removing the selling of junk foods in other ways can benefits the school as the worker will spend less time cleaning the grounds and more time for other productive purposes (Green 2005). Hence, it is cogent argument for the school to disallowed the selling of junk foods in school canteen.

All in all, selling of junk foods in school canteen should be banned for these three indisputable facts, it will caused behavioural problem and health problem to the children and brings litter problem to the school. As students spend most of their time in school instead of home, the school’s authority should play their role in educating the students towards a healthy lifestyle. Hence, I strongly believe that selling of junk food in school canteen should be prohibited.

Just a reminder..

A credit should be given to my friend, Ainda, who had email me this info...
Although it sounds ridiculous, but well, just as a reminder.

NEW FRAUD TACTICS

Someone shared the following cases :

(1) Today I passed by a building which has an ATM machine. There was an oldman looking at me. Suddenly, he called me. He said he didn't know how to read, so he gave me his ATM card and asked me to help him withdraw money from the ATM machine. I answered 'NO!! If you need help, ask the security to help you.' Then he said 'nevermind.. ' and continued to find other people to help him...* ** *REMEMBER : ATM machines have CCTVs.
If you help him he will later claim that you have robbed him or stolen his ATM card. Besides, his ATM card could be a stolen one. So please be careful of these tactics.**

(2) Suddenly your house lights go off. From your window you find that your neighbours still have lights. So you go out of your house to check the MeterBox. But once you open the door, a knife will be pointing at you and preventing you from closing it. This is when you will be robbed and injured.
REMEMBER : Even though your electricity suddenly goes off, DO NOT open your door immediately. Look around to see if there is anything unusual or if there is any noise around.

(3) This is another incident. You may have heard it before, it is about a lady who she saw a kid crying by the roadside. When she spoke to the kid, the kid told her he was lost and wanted her to take him home. The kid even gave her a paper with his house address. So she took him home. But when she rang the door bell, she had an electric shock. Later when she woke up, she was naked in an empty room.
**REMEMBER : Being such a compassionate and helpful person might not be a good thing these days. Pass this on and girls, please be careful..DON'T BE TOO KIND!!**

(4) One day, there was an old lady outside my house holding 2 packets of sweets. At first I thought she was our neighbour and wanted to give us these packs of sweets as a gift. But then when she spoke, I can realised that she was foreigner. I could not understand what she was talking about. I guessed she must be asking for money.I sensed there was something wrong and immediately closed the door and ignored her. Later, I found she and an accomplice robbed someone else down the road.

(5) I was at the ATM machine to withdraw some money. Behind me, there was an old lady. She asked me whether I was able to withdraw my money because she said she had problem with her machine. Suddenly a small girl came up beside me. The small girl was squeezing infront of me. I thought she was just naughty and playful. But then, the small girl put her hand at the tray of the ATM machine where the money comes out, ready to take away my money. I sensed something wrong and immediately pushed her away. Later I realised that the small girl and the old lady worked together. She was trying to steal my money while the old lady was trying to distract my attention by asking me questions!
REMEMBER: BE VERY CAREFUL when you are at an ATM machine and be alert.Look out for anyone suspicious around you!

(6) My parents are retired and stay at home most days. One afternoon,a young stranger went to their house and said his motorcycle had no more petrol and the petrol station was too far for him to push his bike there. So he asked my parents for an empty coke bottle to buy some petrol. He said he will pay RM2 for the bottle. So my mum took one coke bottle for him.He really took out the money from his pocket, but it was a RM 100 note.He told my mum he had no small change and asked my mum to give him the change.Luckily my mum was smart. She just told him to take it for free.
* *REMEMBER : obviously that note is fake!! Who would want to pay for RM2 for an empty coke bottle!! It's very OBVIOUS that that stranger is a trickster.**

(7) This happened in Shanghai. A few years ago, a lady reported to the police that her cousin sister was missing in the shopping complex. But after 5 years, one of her friends found her cousin sister begging at the road side one of the streets in Bangkok, Thailand . The worst thing is that her cousin sister has no more limbs and her body was tied to a lamp post with a shackle(metal chain).

(8) Let's just shorten this story. DO NOT open your house door when you hear the sound of a BABY CRYING!! It might be a trap! Women in the house must be alert to this trick. The police said it is the work of a robber or murderer using the recording of a baby crying to attract your attention. This normally happens at night and when you are alone in the house.

(9) I read an email that was sent by my friend. Her friend, known as A,went to Luo Hu Commercial City with 2 friends, B and C. Luo HuCommercial Cityis the Shenzhen counterfeit goods distribution center. There are many people there. It's also near to the ShenZhen train station and Hong Kong 'sLuo HuPort. C went to the toilet at the shopping centre while A and B waited outside. After waiting for a long, time they felt uneasy and went into the toilet to look for her. When they went in, there was nobody inside.Both were scared and they called C's phone. There was no reply. So they reported to the police. The police asked them whether they had seen anybody suspicious going into the toilet. Both said there were none and its impossible to bring a life person out of the toilet without them noticing!. Then A remembered seeing a cleaner pushing a trolley in, and then coming out. The police told them that was not the 1st time such a thing happened. The police suspected a gang of criminals who were always attacking women in the the toilet of shopping complexes.They use cleaners to kidnap people to harvest their organs for sale.
* *REMEMBER : please be careful when using the toilet. Do not go to the washroom or toilet ALONE!! Please at least have a partner with you