Arguementative Essay Final Draft - TV

All levels of people, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidenced by American Time Use Survey (2003), most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologists and parents on extensive television viewing as it may affects children's thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claim that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. I totally agree with that as I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient way of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news programmes. This has been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programmes help young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used as an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It is also agreed by Rutherford (2002), whereby he states that television viewing enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impacts to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefit the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skills of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #2 - TV

All level of generation, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidenced by American Time Use Survey (2003), a survey on average hours per day spent in leisure and sports activities for the total population by selected characteristics showed that most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologists and parents on extensive television viewing of unsuitable programme towards children as it may affects their thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claims that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. I totally agree with that as I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient ways of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news programmes. This had been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programmes help young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used as an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It is also agreed by Rutherford (2002), whereby he states that television viewing enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impacts to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefits the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skill of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. Hence, it is a desirable outcome for the survey conducted by UK Time Use Survey (2000), which they found out that full-time workers in United Kingdom had spent most of their times on television, video and radio rather than socialising, sports and exercise, attending entertainment and cultural events, and other activities. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #1 - TV

All level of generation, from young to old, cannot escape from being captivated by television since it was first invented (Leigh 2001). As evidence by American Time Use Survey (2003), a survey on average hours per day spent in leisure and sports activities for the total population by selected characteristics showed that most people including men and women spent most of their time watching television, about 2 to 3 hours per day. There is a concern among psychologist and parents on extensive television viewing of unsuitable programme towards children as it may affects their thinking development and health (Sharif 1999). But, some claims that there are much more benefits that children can get from watching television. As for me, I firmly believe that television viewing brings more benefits to the viewer with the stand of this three cogent facts, it gives them access to the latest current events, a more efficient ways of learning and also helps to develop their critical thinking skills.

Firstly, if television is used expeditiously, it can be used as a tool to know what is happening currently in the world through the news program. This had been further justified by Sharif (1999), whereby she mentions that television programs helps young people to have the access to the worldwide issues and it may inspire them to do charity works such as collecting money for victims of famine in Africa. Rutherford (2002) also admits that the habit of watching television gives public the knowledge which incites them to become involved and exert pressure on administration, major firms and even national governments. Additionally, it is “..also good talking points to share with friends.” (Sharif 1999, p.34). Hence, it proves that knowing the latest current news brings advantages to the public in many ways.

Secondly, television can be used an additional dimension for learning process. People are more likely easier to accept new knowledge through audio-visual ways rather than simply read it on books (Leigh 2001). It also agreed by Rutherford, 2002, whereby he states that through television viewing, it enables the viewers to know better about the culture and beauty of the other parts of the world, learn facts on flora and fauna in much more interesting and fun ways, and also enjoy the learning of scientific equation which actually involved several complicated steps. Kindergartners are able to count, distinguish letters of the alphabet and even complete words before they enter school through watching television program (Leigh 2001). “These children also tend to have a larger vocabulary.” (Leigh 2001, pp.24-25). Ultimately, it is indisputable proof that watching television brings positive impact to people educationally.

Thirdly, television viewing can benefits the viewers in a way of developing their critical thinking skills. Such a skill is a crux in both social settings and even at school. For instance, family members can discuss whether the method shown in a television programme to solve a conflict is applicable in real-life situation or not and thus comply with the development of their critical thinking (Sharif 1999). Leigh (2001), also comes to this conclusion whereby he states that since television offers variety of show on a wide range of human problems ranging from globalisation to homelessness, it encourages critical thinking among the public about the issues. Briefly, television can be used as an engaging medium to sharpen the thinking skill of viewers.

In short, television viewing brings more benefits to the viewers since it provides viewers with the latest current news, an enjoyable way of learning and also encourages development of people’s thinking skills. Hence, it is a desirable outcome for the survey conducted by UK Time Use Survey (2000), which they found out that full-time workers in United Kingdom had spent most of their times on television, video and radio rather than socialising, sports and exercise, attending entertainment and cultural events, and other activities. When used properly, actually, watching television is absolutely valuable (Rutherford 2002). With that, I am prone to my stance that television viewing brings more benefits than harms.

Final Draft of Junk Food Essay

Should the sale of junk food in school be banned?

Food that is said to be insalubrious and with low nourishment content is categorized as junk food (Smith 2005). Based on statistics made by Australian Nutrition Journal (2004), most Australian children take foods rich in fat and sugar more than recommended intake which most of the foods are junk food. This has become an issue in Australia as it is being alleged as major factors of childhood obesity (Weekend News 2005). Consequently, an idea of restricting the selling of junk foods in school canteens is propound. I strongly agree with that as I firmly believe that the habit of eating junk food can leads to behavioural problem, exacerbate a person's health and cause increment in litter conundrum.

First factor that leads me to support my notion is that the habit of eating junk food can cause attitude problems among the children. This is further explained by Smith (2009), whereby he states that most chemical additives within junk food could cause children to be hyperactive and a lapse in concentration. Besides that, according to Green (2005), as a teacher he can see that removing junk food from his school canteen results in amelioration of student's behaviour in class. They became much calmer after their lunch. Thus, selling of junk food in school canteen should be banned for the sake of student's benefits.

Second factor is the habit of binge on junk food also detrimental to health. Selling of junk food in school canteen actually leads to the problem of childhood obesity which can result in future effects such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and some cancers (Weekend News 2005). Studies had been done and they conclude that the most popular snack foods are under the categories of low nutritional value (Health Foundation 2005). If the selling is to be continued, students cannot get the nutrients required for healthy growth and development (Cray 2005). "...decline in the dental health of Australia's primary-school children" (Weekend News 2005, p.6) is also one of the concern regarding the negative effects of eating junk foods. In short, to improve on the students' learning potential, the school canteen should be prohibited from selling unwholesome foods and drinks.

Lastly, the habit of eating junk foods is not beneficial to the students and also it affects the school in the sense of litter problem. This is further justify by Smith (2005), whereby he states that snack food packaging is found out to be major contributor to litter problem in school. This will leads to hike in cleaning cost for the school plus eroding the good image of the communities. Removing the selling of junk foods in other ways can benefits the school as the workers will spend less time cleaning the grounds and more time for other productive purposes (Green 2005). Hence, it is cogent argument for the school to disallow the selling of junk foods in school canteen.

All in all, selling of junk foods in school canteen should be banned for these three indisputable facts, it will caused behavioural problem and aggravates the children's health and also brings litter problem to the school. As students spend most of their time in school instead of home, the school's authority should play their role in educating the students towards a healthy lifestyle. Hence, I strongly stand on my notion that selling of junk food in school canteen should be prohibited.

ArGuMenTaTiVe EsSaY #2

Should the sale of junk food in school be banned?

Food that is said to be insalubrious and with low alimentation content are categorizes as junk food (Smith 2005, p.3). Based on statistics made by Australian Nutrition Journal (2004), most Australian children take foods rich in fat and sugar more than recommended intake which most of the foods are junk food. This has become an issue in Australia as it is being alleged as major factors of childhood obesity (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Consequently, an idea of restricting the selling of junk foods in school canteens is propound. I strongly agree with that as I firmly believe that the habit of eating junk food can leads to behavioural problem, exacerbate a person's health and cause increment in litter conundrum.

First factor that leads me to support my notion is that the habit of eating junk food can caused attitude problems among the children. This is further explained by Smith (2009), whereby he states that most chemical additives within junk food could cause children to be hyperactive and a lapse in concentration. Besides that, according to Green (2005), as a teacher he can see that removing junk food from his school canteen results in amelioration of student's behaviour in class. They became much calmer after their lunch. Thus, selling of junk food in school canteen should be banned for the sake of student's benefits.

Second factor is the habit of binge on junk food also detrimental to health. Selling of junk food in school canteen actually leads tot he problem of childhood obesity which can result in future efects such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and some cancers (Weekend News 2005, p.6). Studies had been done and they conclude that the most popular snack foods are under the categories of low nutritional value (Health Foundation 2005). If the selling is to be continued, students cannot get the nutrients required for healthy growth and development (Cray 2005). "...decline in the dental health of Australia's primary-school children' (Weekend News 2005, p.6) is also one of the concern regarding the negative effects of eating junk foods. In short, to improve on the students' learning potential, the school canteen should be prohibited from selling unwholesome foods and drinks.


Lastly, the habit of eating junk foods is not beneficial to the students and also it affects the school in the sense of litter problem. This is further justified by Smith (2005), whereby he stated that snack food packaging is found out to be major contributor to litter problem in school. This will leads to hike in cleaning cost for the school plus eroding the good image of the communities. Removing the selling of junk foods in other ways can benefits the school as the workers will spend less time cleaning the grounds and more time for other productive purposes (Green 2005). Hence, it is cogent argument for the school to disallow the selling of junk foods in school canteen.


All in all, selling of junk foods in school canteen should be banned for these three indisputable facts, it will caused behavioural problem and aggravates the children's health and also brings litter problem to the school. As students spend most of their time in school instead of home, the school's authority should plat their role in educating the students towards a healthy lifestyle. Hence, I strongly stand on my notion that selling of junk food in school canteen should be prohibited.